Open computing urged
Ringland asks Faculty Senate to support GNU/Linux system
By
DONNA LONGENECKER
Reporter Assistant Editor
The
free flow of information and direct access to itboth of which
are critical to scholarship and research, according to John Ringland,
associate professor of mathematicsis being severely threatened
by the entertainment, publishing and proprietary software industries.
Ringland
maintains that the goal of these industries is to undermine and limit
the public's access to copyrighted and non-copyrighted material by a
combination of "draconian" laws and "restrictive new architectures for
computer hardware and software."
A
major proponent of open source computing, Ringland presented his views
at the Faculty Senate meeting on April 9, lobbying senators to pass
a resolution asking the university to fully support the GNU/Linux operating
system and the use of open-source application software on campus wherever
possible.
He
also is seeking support of a preference for open formats and communication
protocols wherever possible in hopes of discouraging the gratuitous
use of proprietary formats.
Open
source software allows any software developer to modify the software
and adapt it to his or her needs.
"The
information age is about to become the age of information control,"
Ringland told senators.
He
said unfettered access to informationa basic tenet of any university's
core missionis in great jeopardy due to a variety of user controls
embedded in the software and designed, in part, to lead to a pay-per-use
for each occasion material is viewed or used.
The
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) enacted in 1998 is, according
to Ringland, a further vehicle to restrict, making it a criminal offense
to circumvent technological use-control measures.
He
cited examples of how he said license agreements governing the use of
software directly infringe upon users' access to information. Microsoft's
end-user license agreement for Frontpage, a Web-page design tool, states
that "You may not use the software in connection with any site that
disparages Microsoft, MSN, MSNBC, Expedia or their products or services,
infringes on any intellectual property or other rights of these parties,
violates any state, federal or international law, or promotes racism,
hatred or pornography."
"How
much of a step to similar restrictions on the use of (Microsoft) Word?"
Ringland asked. "These terms of use constitute unacceptable restrictions
on tools essential for research, teaching and communication."
Deeper-level
controls may soon become law if the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television
Promotion Act (CBDTPA) is passed, Ringland said.
"It
will become illegal to manufacture a computer that does not contain
specific government-approved control measures in the hardware," he said.
"Moreover, it will also be illegal to distribute any software programs
that do not contain embedded control mechanisms. This would make all
system-level programming potentially criminal, and would create a massive
impediment to adapting computers to specific research needs."
Open
source software, such as the operating system GNU/Linux, which Ringland
promotes, uses open, non-proprietary document formats and comes with
"zero licensing costs," he said. In addition, every application and
even the basic GNU/Linux operating system can be freely adapted to specific
research needs.
UB
has an agreement with Microsoft to provide software for its faculty,
staff and students at a cost of approximately $492,000.
"This
sophisticated operating system is capable today of fulfilling all the
desktop needs of most university faculty, staff and students. High-quality,
open-source applications are available for all day-to-day tasks, such
as word processing, creating spreadsheets and presentations, Web browsing,
playing audio and video media, image editing, serving files, printing,
etc.," Ringland told senators.
UB's
agreement with Microsoft, on the other hand, was adopted by the University
Software Licensing Committee without faculty input and is "the most
expensive license of all" said Ringland, adding that Microsoft leverages
the Windows operating system to make open formats and protocols incompatible
with non-Microsoft systems. Another crucial difference between open
source software and Microsoft is the "mandatory upgrade" syndromeopen
source computing is free from these kinds of major disadvantages, he
explained.
Ringland
presented a resolution calling for the faculty to strongly oppose DMCA
and CBDTPA, "both of which restrict academic and intellectual freedom,
as well as measurably impede research and growth." He urged the faculty
to call for UB President William R. Greiner and Provost Elizabeth D.
Capaldi to oppose both the law and bill publicly, and to lobby within
the Association of American Universities and SUNY to encourage both
entities to adopt policies opposing these laws and any successor legislation
that threatens academic freedom and research.
"Microsoft
is an eager and active participant in freedom-abridging activities,
making it troubling that this universitywithout faculty study
or approvalhas so strongly aligned itself with this anti-academic
corporation," Ringland said.
In
other business the senate approved a resolution calling for the administration
to either fix OASIS, the Oracle data management software program that
manages grants and contracts for researchers at UB, or abandon it altogether.
The
senate also heard an update on the Buffalo Center for Bioinformatics
from Senior Vice Provost Bruce Holm.