Faculty Research Grants

This project revisits Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s 1989 classic Epistemology of the Closet, a foundational text of queer theory, in order to locate Judaism and Jewishness in the intellectual genealogy of gender and sexuality studies. While much of queer theory presents itself as decidedly secular, Epistemology of the Closet is concerned throughout with ambivalence concerning this apparent secularity, an ambivalence that gathers and knots its considerable ideological energies around the ambiguously religio-racial figure of the Jew. Attending to this figure’s spectral presence in Sedgwick’s field-defining thinking affords a challenging new understanding of the origins and conceptual underpinnings of what turns out to be a not-so-familiar canonical work of queer theory. A Faculty Research Grant from the Gender Institute will support research in Sedgwick’s personal archives housed at Duke University’s Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library in Spring/Summer 2025.

Dr. Samuel P. Catlin is the Irving M. and Marilyn C. Shuman Visiting Assistant Professor in the Department of Jewish Thought at UB. A scholar of American Jewish literature, he is currently completing two monographs: Judaism in Theory, which situates an often-elided preoccupation with Judaism at the center of the post-1960s American mode of intellectual inquiry called “theory”; and The Rest is Literature: Secularism and the Institution of Literary Studies, which tracks the institutional, discursive, and disciplinary imbrications of literary research and pedagogy with a secularist ideal of American political identity in the twentieth century. His latest article, “Auerbach’s Abraham(s): Biblical Narrative and the Genesis of Critical Reading,” is forthcoming from Prooftexts. He also writes regularly for a broader public in publications such as Parapraxis, Political Theology Network, Post45: Contemporaries, and The New Republic, among others.

Dr. Kim Chaney is an Assistant Professor in the University at Buffalo’s Department of Psychology whose research focuses on how everyday people theorize about and understand how prejudice operates in themselves, others, and society broadly, with implications for how people confront prejudice, express allyship, and experience discrimination. By examining basic and applied questions about how people perceive, experience, and combat prejudice in their day to day lives, her research aims to broaden our understanding of prejudice and stigma, especially as it relates to cognitive, health, and behavioral outcomes. Dr. Chaney has published over 30 peer-reviewed articles and was named a 2024 Rising Star by the Association for Psychological Science APS).

Gender is typically collected in binary terms in publicly available higher education datasets that offer enrollment data; however, at the beginning of the 2014-15 academic year, the American Bar Association started collecting enrollment data from law schools using a third category, labeled “other” gender. This change in data collection represents a more inclusive approach to gender identification that acknowledges that binary categories are insufficient. As law schools have been one of the only types of higher education institutions required to report the number of students who identify as “other” in gender, this field is an important case study to understand gendered data collection. Through descriptive statistical analysis and semi-structured interviews, this project investigates how law school administrators make decisions about how to collect, code, and report student demographic data. This research is critical for understanding how data collection within legal institutions is currently being done and how it can be done in ways that affirm the lived experiences of students and provide data that can help illuminate inequities in resources and policies. This research is being conducted in collaboration with Dr. Karly S. Ford, Associate Professor at Pennsylvania State University and Dr. Khadejah Ray, PRODiG+ Postdoctoral Fellow at the University at Buffalo.

Dr. Megan Holland Iantosca is an Associate Professor at the University at Buffalo in the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy.  She is a sociologist of education and her research focuses on understanding the causes and consequences of racial, gender and class inequality during educational transitions and racial/ethnic and gender categorization processes within institutions. She is the author of Divergent Paths to College: Race, Class and Inequality in High Schools (Rutgers University Press) and has published in a number of scholarly journals including The Journal of Higher Education, Teacher’s College Record, Sociology of Education, and Sociological Forum. Her research has been supported by grants and fellowships from the Spencer Foundation and the American Sociological Association. 

Chamorus, the Indigenous peoples of the Mariånas archipelago in the Western Pacific Ocean, are a matrilineal, clan-based society. Before colonization, maga’håga’ (highest-ranking daughters) led the clans, inherited and stewarded our clans’ resources, and were the final decision-makers in village council meetings. Today, Chamoru women continue to steward our Indigenous nation, as reflected in their disproportionate participation and leadership in Chamoru movements for Indigenous sovereignty. Drawing from survey data (n=968) from an original participatory action research project in my homeland of Guåhan (the archipelago’s southernmost island), I empirically investigate the utility of Indigenous feminist theories in explaining gendered differentials in Chamoru political attitudes towards multiple dimensions of the colonial U.S.-Guåhan relationship—including welfare rights ineligibility, political disenfranchisement, militarization of our sacred tåno’ (land) and tåsi (water). Ultimately, this project highlights the value of cross-pollination between Indigenous feminist theories and quantitative political science research, while illuminating the complex role that Chamoru women continue to play in Guåhan’s ongoing struggle against the U.S.’ violent and perverse colonial chokehold.

Kevin Lujan Lee (Chamoru) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Indigenous Studies. As a political sociologist, he engages with theories and methodologies from sociology, Indigenous Studies, and political science to improve how we understand Indigenous mobilizations against contemporary formations of empire and settler-colonialism. His current research focuses on (1) the Indigenous politics of decolonization in Oceania; (2) Pacific Islander social movements in the continental United States; and (3) Indigenous Oceanic political thought, in collaboration with Josh Campbell (UCLA). His interdisciplinary research has been published in the fields of political science (Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics), Indigenous and Pacific Studies (Wíčazo Ša Review, The Contemporary Pacific), and urban planning (Environment and Planning F, Planning Theory & Practice). He was previously a Killam Postdoctoral Fellow in Political Science at the University of British Columbia and holds a PhD in Urban Planning and Politics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Kelsey Lewis is an Assistant Professor in Global Gender and Sexuality Studies. Lewis' overarching professional goal is to participate in undoing the paradigm of binary sex in biology and medicine. Lewis engages in collaborative projects ranging from sex-diverse gender-inclusive biology education to sex-inclusive approaches to healthcare. Lewis came to UB in 2022 from the Witting Postdoctoral Fellowship in Feminist Biology at University of Wisconsin-Madison. She was previously an AAUW American Dissertation Fellow and an NSF Graduate Research Fellow. 

In this project, Nereson argues that Two Spirit powwow and second line dance practices function as collective choreographies for queer affirmation and solidarity that intervene in heteropatriarchal structures of dance, society, and education as they have developed in the US from the nineteenth century to the present. This project is related to their next book, Reparative Encounters: Universities, the Arts, and the Afterlives of Dispossession, which traces the survivance of Black and Indigenous aesthetic production through an analysis of how and why universities in the US fund the arts in response to their historical entwinement with racialized labor and land dispossession, specifically the transatlantic slave trade and Indigenous genocide. One of the book’s chapters focuses on extracurricular dance practices by students that refuse the racialized enclosure of the university as they simultaneously affirm queer identity and relation, specifically the choreographies of powwow and second line. These forms historically developed as heteronormative competition structures, and they hope to document and analyze spaces where heteropatriarchy is undermined and relations enacted otherwise in second line as well as Two Spirit powwow.

Ariel Nereson is Associate Professor of Dance Studies and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Theatre and Dance at the University at Buffalo – SUNY. She is the author of the award-winning book Democracy Moving: Bill T. Jones, Contemporary American Performance, and the Racial Past, as well as several essays about movement-based performance, race, and embodiment in the United States. Her research has most recently been recognized with the Robert Schanke Research Award (Mid-America Theatre Conference), and the Sally Banes Prize (American Society for Theatre Research). Ariel is coeditor of Theatre Journal, and a practicing choreographer and dramaturg.

This faculty award from the Gender Institute will enable me to travel to Europe to research for my book project, Bauhaus Under Nazism: Creativity, Collaboration, and Resistance in Hitler’s Germany, 1933-1945. The book tells the story of how members of the Bauhaus art and design movement came to grips with life under the Nazi dictatorship. As arguably the most influential twentieth-century art, architecture, and design school, the Bauhaus transformed teaching and practice across disciplines and media. Unlike most scholars who focus on iconic Bauhaus figures in exile after the school’s 1933 closure, I consider the majority of the movement’s 1,400 members—over eighty percent—who remained in Nazi-occupied Europe. This approach recasts the movement’s history after 1933 into one of surprising compatibility with Nazism. Many adapted to the regime or even embraced it. Some worked as artists or in design and media; others designed concentration camps and armaments plants. Understanding how Bauhaus art and design served the Nazi regime challenges common assumptions of Nazi aesthetics as uniquely retrograde and modern art movements as intrinsically virtuous. And it reveals the complexities negotiated by those marginalized in Nazi society, including communist, Jewish, queer, and female Bauhäusler.

Elizabeth Otto is Director of the Humanities Institute and Professor of Modern and Contemporary Art History at UB. She is the author of scholarly articles and books including Haunted Bauhaus: Occult Spirituality, Gender Fluidity, Queer Identities, and Radical Politics (2019), Tempo, Tempo! The Bauhaus Photomontages of Marianne Brandt (2005), and, together with Patrick Rössler, Bauhaus Women: A Global Perspective. In 2024, she co-curated the exhibition “Bauhaus and National Socialism,” which was shown in three locations in the German city of Weimar and viewed by over 83,000 people.

Dr. Parks is a Senior Research Scientist in the Department of Psychology. Her research focuses on young adult substance use and associated-negative consequences. Her most recent work focuses on development of preventive interventions aimed at reducing sexual assault of college women by increasing risk awareness and reducing heavy substance use.

My book manuscript, Anonymous Cinema in the Global Age, is the first comprehensive attempt to theorize anonymous modes of expression in global cinema from a historical, social, and political perspective. The book examines anonymous forms of cinema that have recently arisen as a means of protest against repressive regimes across the globe in countries such as Iran, Egypt, and Syria. The book’s first chapter highlights the phenomenon of contemporary anonymous women directors, focusing on the filmmaker who identifies herself as either Ana Nyma or Anonymous (Iran) and the anonymous collective Abounaddara (Syria), the majority of whom are women. Anonymous authorship may invite inquiry or arouse curiosity but given the inflammatory subject of the political situation in these countries, it becomes necessary for mere survival. In this chapter I argue that Ana Nyma and Abounaddara adopt their rebellious and defiant tactics in response to state-sanctioned erasure and obscurity, expressing their feminisms in a folded way. Both the book project and its first chapter reflect my effort not only to give more prominence and resonance to women’s voices but also to highlight the role of non-Western women directors and their unique modes of expression in world cinema. By offering a detailed examination of global cinematic anonymity, I seek to make an original and significant contribution to film and media studies, feminist theory, and postcolonial theory.

Tanya Shilina-Conte is Assistant Professor of Global Film Studies in the Department of English, University at Buffalo. She is the founder of the Center for Global Media, director of the Global Film minor, and curator of the Global Film Series. Her book, Black Screens, White Frames: Gilles Deleuze and the Filmmaking Machine, was published by Oxford University Press in 2024. She is currently at work on a new book, Anonymous Cinema in the Global Age, which will feature a chapter on Iranian and Syrian anonymous women filmmakers. Her articles and book chapters have appeared in Screen, Film-Philosophy, Frames Cinema Journal, Word & Image, Studia Phænomenologica, Iran Namag, Leitura: Teoria & Prática, Studia Linguistica, Border Visions: Identity and Diaspora in Film, and elsewhere. Her work has been supported by the UB Faculty Grant for Global and International Research; UB Humanities Institute Faculty Research Fellowship; UB Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy Research Grant; Dr. Nuala McGann Drescher Program Award, SUNY; Centro Congressi Stefano Franscini Grant, Switzerland; Lisbon Consortium Grant, Catholic University of Portugal; Princeton-Weimar Grant, International Research Institute for Cultural Technologies and Media Philosophy, Bauhaus-Universität, Germany; Philipps University Grant, Germany; the Canadian-American Studies Grant; George Soros Open World Society Grant; American Councils for International Education Grant; and National Council for Economic Education Grant, among others.

The clinical causes of maternal deaths in Nigeria are well established; however, the long history of socio-cultural “cause and effect” that shape these deaths are not. In this second book project, Dying to Bring Life: A Social History of Maternal Deaths in Nigeria, I approach maternal deaths as incidents that are mired in a long history of cultural practices and political structures. I analyze the evolving ways in which communities have understood or grappled with maternal deaths in environments of economic handicaps, inadequate medical infrastructure, and resource scarcity. How, for instance, have cultural practices surrounding maternal deaths “normalized” these deaths or rendered them as silences and invisible discourses within the national framework? What forces – cultural, political, religious, and socio-economic – throughout the twentieth century have shaped the meanings and narratives of maternal deaths in Nigeria? With its significant global burden of maternal deaths – about 20 per cent – I demonstrate the sustained impacts of historical events, such as the neglect of women’s health and education under colonial rule in the early to mid-twentieth century; the personnel and infrastructure crises of post-civil war Nigeria since the 1960s; the political debates over abortion legislation in the 1970s and 80s, and the enduring culture of shame in traditional societies, on maternal mortality.

Dr. Ogechukwu Williams is an Associate Professor of History, with a focus on maternal and reproductive health in Africa. She is the author of Birth Politics: Colonial Power, Medical Pluralism, and Maternity in Nigeria, forthcoming with Johns Hopkins University Press in 2025. She is currently working on a second book project, Dying to Bring Life: A Social History of Maternal Deaths in Nigeria, which utilizes oral histories, annual medical reports, anthropological reports, newspapers, and legal proceedings to examine maternal deaths. in colonial and post-colonial Nigeria. Dr. Williams’ publications have appeared in several peer reviewed journals, including Social History of Medicine, Journal of African History, Journal of African Art History and Visual Culture, and Africa.

In this project, Annahita Ball will use qualitative meta-synthesis methodology to review andsynthesize existing research on white middle class mothers’ engagement in U.S. schools. Most research on parent engagement in schools focuses on understanding and improving schools’ efforts to engage marginalized parents. A growing line of inquiry investigates the engagement practices of white middle class parents, yet no theoretical frameworks exist to guide research and practice with this population. Current studies also do not focus on mothers, even though parent behavior is gendered and white women have been historically responsible for maintaining whiteness in their daily lives. Using good mothering ideology as a theoretical lens, this study will synthesize qualitative research on white middle class mothers’ engagement in education to uncover a new theory of educational engagement specific to white middle class mothers. Findings will guide the development of an intergroup dialogue (IGD) intervention to bridge differences across parents from differing social locations.

Dr. Annahita Ball, an Associate Professor in the University at Buffalo School of Social Work, investigates the “school-adjacent” mechanisms that advance educational justice and health equity, such as social-emotional learning, family engagement, and school mental health service delivery. She conducts transdisciplinary community-engaged research in collaboration with education and mental health institutions, community mental health providers, and youth and families. In 2022, Dr. Ball launched the Western New York School Mental Health Taskforce to address the national youth mental health crisis and work closely with the Erie County’s Supporting Mental Health by Advocating by Resources Together (SMART) Collaborative. Her most recent research explores and develops strategies to bridge social division in American school communities.

The archival research Jen will conduct this summer in Kentucky, Alabama, and North Carolina with the support of a Gender Institute Faculty Fellowship will contribute to her second book project and a scholarly journal article, “Her Yet Unwritten History: Black Women and the Education of Deaf and Blind Students in the Jim Crow South.” This article explores the long-overlooked role of Black women, both hearing and Deaf, who served as educators, administrators, and advocates for Black disabled children in the segregated South. Women such as Susan Lowe in Nashville, Tennessee – who opened a school for blind children in her own home when they were excluded from schools for Black (nondisabled) children and (white) blind children – drew on their own lived experiences of intersectionality to work against the overlapping forces of racism and ableism in their students’ lives.

Jenifer L. Barclay is an associate professor of history and associate director of the Center for Disability Studies. She is also a 2023-24 UB Humanities Institute fellow and a 2024-25 fellow at Cornell University’s Society for the Humanities. She is the author of The Mark of Slavery: Disability, Race, and Gender in Antebellum America (University of Illinois Press, 2021) and numerous journal articles and book chapters in publications such as Slavery & Abolition, Women, Gender, and Families of Color, and the Oxford Handbook of Disability History. She is currently working on her second monograph, Between Two Worlds: A Black Disability History of Southern Education from Emancipation to Integration and completing a co-edited collection with Stefanie Hunt-Kennedy, Cripping the Archive: Disability, History, and Power (forthcoming, University of Illinois Press).

Interventions to address intimate partner violence homicide (IPVH) largely rest with criminal justice and social service professionals. Yet, research demonstrates the need for community level interventions, specifically among Black Americans. However, there is a gap in what we know about Black Americans’ experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of high-risk intimate partner violence, and how to build community level responses to prevent IPVH.  This study seeks to fill this gap. A total of 800+ participants will be recruited via Qualtrics survey panels. Inclusion criteria are Black Americans, ages 18+. Participants will complete a survey on their experiences, attitudes, and perceptions of high-risk intimate partner violence.  Participants will be asked open-ended questions about community interventions to address IPVH. Univariate, bivariate and regressions will be used to analyze the data. Data will be used as pilot for an NIJ or OVW grant. Final products include a publishable manuscript and a conference presentation. By understanding high-risk IPVH from Black Americans perspectives,’ the identification and creation of community-based risk reduction strategies efforts is possible.

Noelle M. St. Vil is an Associate Professor in the UB School of Social Work. St. Vil is a graduate of Howard University, where she studied under Tricia Bent-Goodley, a leading expert in the field of intimate partner violence in the Black community. She completed her postdoctoral studies at Johns Hopkins University, under the guidance of world-renowned domestic violence expert, Dr. Jacqueline Campbell, creator of the Danger Assessment. Dr. St. Vil’s research focuses on supporting positive Black intimate relationships, with the aim of strengthening Black families and communities. Her research challenges scholarship that ignores systemic oppression, pathologizes, victim-blames, and stereotypes Black intimate relationships. Dr. St. Vil’s work highlights the disproportionate risks and dangers faced in Black intimate relationships but looks at these risks and dangers through a lens that is critical of historical and structural racism and affirming of Black resilience. Her scholarship concentrates on two dimensions of Black intimate relationships: 1) Violence Against Women; and 2) sexual behavior, health, and well-being. She has published 25 articles and seven book chapters.

The Proposed project will explore democratic conditions that facilitate - or hinder - vulnerable, disenfranchised citizens’ ability to participate in climate resilience measures. Specifically, the work will focus on women, who typically have lower socioeconomic status, social position, and earning power relative to men, and particularly single-mother households, who are considered to be the leading segment of the feminization of US poverty. The effect of cultures of American democracy to support a sustainable future will be measured through their impact on affordability, availability, familiarity, and equal opportunity of access and adaption to climate change resilience measures for single-mother households.

Dr. Barbara Wejnert is Professor in the Department of Environment and Sustainability and is also a faculty member at the Jaeckel Center for Law, Democracy, and Governing at the University at Buffalo. She is an award-winning author of research papers specializing in democracy, politics and energy security, political sociology, environmental sustainability, and gender. Her interdisciplinary, transnational research focuses on the worldwide diffusion of democracy, the rise of autocracy, and the effects of these changes on energy democracy, environmental sustainability, and gender equity. ​She is an author and editor of 14 books, including Diffusion of Democracy ( 2014), published by Cambridge University Press, a database Nations, Development and Democracy (2005) published by the Interuniversity Consortium for Social and Political Research, and over 80 peer-reviewed articles in professional journals related to democratizing processes and their consequences on environmental politics and sustainability, gender equality, and development. In 2016, her work on gender and democracy received the Inaugural Arlene Kaplan Daniels Paper Award. Her work on the diffusion of democracy was honored by its presentation at the US Congressional Reception as a poster highlighting sociological research with national policy significance.  

In this project Murshid will elucidate the specific ways in which both oppression and resistance to oppression takes place. The project will reveal the mechanism through which oppression is produced in the context of migration, socio-economics, capital and labor flows, and representation of Bangladeshis in the Global North. On the solutions side, the project will examine the role of arts in producing cross-class solidarity and resistance to violence through inculcation of safe spaces and community building.

Nadine Shaanta Murshid is Associate Professor at the School of Social Work. Her research focuses on economic institutions, migration, structural violence, and partner violence in the lives of individuals in and from the global South.

This Faculty Research Grant will support the mentorship and training of two graduate students to aid in the research for a second book project titled Latina/x Abolitionist Feminisms: Incarceration, Agency, and Coalitional Politics, a project that examines how U.S.-based Latina/x feminist scholars and activists have worked across coalitional spaces to critically respond to policing and prisons since, at least, the 1960s. This research training includes, specifically, an archival visit to the University of California’s Ethnic Studies Collection to help catalog and examine the archival materials of a prominent Chicana activist, educator, and researcher, Dr. Velia Garcia (d. 2012). During her lifetime, Dr. Garcia served as a faculty member in the Chicano Studies and Raza Studies programs at UC Berkeley and San Francisco State University, respectively, and worked on the original steering committee of the National Association of Chicana and Chicano Studies. Alongside this academic work, she was also a founding member of the Vacaville Prison Project, an organization dedicated to prison education and advocacy work, including classes with non-incarcerated students in the Bay Area and incarcerated students at the California Medical Facility at Vacaville, California, a state prison located an hour north of the Bay Area. To this day, her contributions to anti-carceral feminism remain unexamined and her archival materials remain uncatalogued. As such, this support from the Gender Institute will enable two graduate assistants to help organize and study Dr. Garcia’s materials.

Andrea J. Pitts is an interdisciplinary researcher and educator whose publications and pedagogy focus on carceral medicine and radical health activism, Latin American and U.S. Latina/x feminisms, prison and police abolition, queer migration studies, critical transgender politics, and disability justice. They are the author of Nos/Otras: Gloria E. Anzaldúa, Multiplicitous Agency, and Resistance (2021), and co-editor of Beyond Bergson: Examining Race and Colonialism through the Writings of Henri Bergson (2019), Theories of the Flesh: Latinx and Latin American Feminisms, Transformation, and Resistance (2020), and Trans Philosophy (forthcoming 2024). Their current book project Latina/x Abolitionist Feminisms: Incarceration, Agency, and Coalitional Politics examines the philosophical contributions made by U.S Latina/x activists and scholars critiquing state violence, prisons, and policing from the 1960s to the early 2000s.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to maltreatment is a strong predictor of intergenerational cycles of abuse and vulnerability. These cycles intersect during the childbearing years when unresolved trauma often adversely affects a woman’s mental health. Women of color are especially at risk for developing PTSD as well experiencing disparities for maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy is an opportune time to intervene to disrupt these cycles, however, screening and treating PTSD in the perinatal period is rarely undertaken. Therefore, readily available interventions for low-resourced and high-risk settings are warranted. Buffalo Prenatal Perinatal Network (BPPN) provides home visiting and other supportive services to pregnant women and their families who bear considerable burden of poverty, adversity, and disparities. Our previous collaborative research has established initial acceptability and feasibility for a novel front-line PTSD-specific perinatal intervention, the Survivor Moms’ Companion (SMC). In the proposed study, we will advance this reach of this intervention through creation and evaluation of Spanish-language translations of the client materials integral to the delivery of the SMC. This effort to increase equity of access to the BPPN Spanish-speaking clients will help to provide for the sustainability of the SMC at BPPN and further its trajectory of research capacity.

Mickey Sperlich, an assistant professor in the School of Social Work, is an experienced midwife and researcher who studies the effects of trauma and mental health challenges on women's childbearing and postpartum experiences and outcomes. She originally became interested in research in order to better understand the needs of her midwifery clients who were trauma survivors. Her first research project culminated in the book "Survivor Moms: Women's Stories of Birthing, Mothering and Healing after Sexual Abuse," which was named the 2008 Book of the Year by the America College of Nurse Midwives. 

Sperlich has taken part in several trauma-focused perinatal studies and is co-author of a psychosocial intervention for pregnant survivors of abuse, the "Survivor Moms' Companion." She completed her PhD with a dual-title in Social Work and Infant Mental Health at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan, in 2014. Sperlich is committed to developing and evaluating trans-disciplinary interventions to understand and address the sequelae of sexual violence and other trauma, particularly in relation to women's reproductive health and childbearing. Sperlich's research also examines the importance of a trauma-informed approach for positioning such interventions and fostering their success. Owing in part to its contribution to maternal mortality, a recent research focus includes looking at gun violence and how to better involve social workers in intervening to prevent such violence. 

For a long time, historians have searched for Ella Briggs. The talented artist, designer, and architect appeared at the turning points and places of history: she painted with the Secessionists in Vienna, created luminous rooms in Gilded Age New York, and erected workers’ housing in Red Vienna before opening her own firm in Berlin at the height of the roaring twenties. By the time Hitler came to power and she fled to London, she had attained an international profile. Yet after her death, historians lost sight of her.

Briggs’s skill in navigating borders and different cultural contexts, which placed her at the hotspots of public discourse about modernism for much of the twentieth century, worked against her inclusion in the history books. Individual scholars have struggled to reconstruct the many facets of her career across place and time, and she remains a shadowy figure in modernist history, even as her name lingers in the margins.

In an ambitious effort to finally reveal Briggs’s story, Despina Stratigakos and Elana Shapira have assembled a team of American, Austrian, British and German historians to collaboratively produce a biography. Scouring archives and attics, they have made breakthrough discoveries about Briggs, her networks and projects, and the transmission of ideas about modern design. Written in an accessible style, the book offers the fascinating story of an inspiring designer determined to leave her mark in these world capitals as well as a new model for writing the elusive histories of women architects.

Despina Stratigakos is a writer, historian, and professor of architecture at the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Her research explores how power and ideology function in architecture, whether in the creation of domestic spaces or of world empires. She is the author of four books. Stratigakos has also published widely on issues of diversity in architecture and promotes awareness of the topic with broad audiences. In 2011, she collaborated with Mattel on the design and launch of Architect Barbie in Mattel’s “I Can Be” Barbie career series. She has been involved in Wikipedia edit-a-thons to increase the women in architecture content on the influential website. She has published in The Atlantic, The Los Angeles Times, and Al Jazeera, among other media outlets. She is a regular contributor to Architect Magazine and Places Journal, where she has published on themes such as the “bro” culture of Albert Speer’s office and gendered stereotypes of architects in Hollywood films.

In Feminist Activism, Right-Wing Populism and the Struggle for Democracy in Latin America, Thomas builds off of extensive field research in Chile to examine the relationships between the growth of vibrant feminist movements and the rise of a new form of right-wing politics. She argues that feminist activism and feminist-inspired social movements have been at the forefront of current attempts to deepen democratic practices and confront social injustice. However, the growth of feminist movements has also been accompanied by the rise of a new form of right-wing populism that particularly target feminist movements and their political gains in on-going right-wing attempts to usher in illiberal and authoritarian politics. While in the past, the political right in Chile—and elsewhere in Latin America—was rooted in a traditional form of heteropatriarchy that valorized the family and rooted men’s political power in their roles as fathers and heads of households, thus positioning women first and foremost as mothers, wives, and daughters, more recent right-wing populist movements have embraced and centered a virulent form of hyper-masculinity based on misogynistic and homophobic. This targeting of feminist gains by rising right-wing populists shows both how powerful feminist ideas have become and the importance of backlash politics in understanding the rise of right-wing populism.

Gwynn Thomas (Chile) is an associate professor and Chair of the Department of Global Gender and Sexuality Studies at the University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Her first book, Contesting Legitimacy in Chile: Familial Ideals, Citizenship, and Political Struggle, 1970–1990 (2011), examines the mobilization of familial beliefs in Chilean political conflicts. Her published work on gender politics, feminist movements, women’s political leadership and participation, and feminist institutionalism appears in The Journal of Women, Politics and Policy; The International Feminist Journal of Politics; Gender & Politics; The Journal of Latin American Studies; Comparative Politics; Comparative Political Studies; Journal of Politics in Latin Americas; and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, as well as a number of important edited collections. She received the Elsa Chaney Award in 2007 from the Gender and Feminist Studies section of the Latin American Studies Association. She is currently working on the relationships between the growth of vibrant feminist movements and the rise of a new form of right-wing politics in Chile, and across Latin America.

This qualitative study focuses on pregnant and parenting women’s experiences in the justice system in relation to motherhood and substance use recovery. These women confront a triple stigma of justice-involvement, substance use, and negative societal judgment about their roles as mothers. They encounter systemic barriers to treatment and support. Investigators are conducting interviews with justice-involved women to learn how they navigate motherhood, substance use treatment, and justice system requirements. The research questions explore: (1) How do participants conceptualize their roles as mothers; (2) Which contextual and intersectional factors affect access to substance use treatment, health care, social services, and other resources; and (3) How has the justice system helped or hindered their ability to recover from addiction and achieve their personal goals, especially related to motherhood? 

Linda S. Kahn, PhD, is a Research Professor and Associate Vice Chair for Research with the Primary Care Research Institute in the Department of Family Medicine. Sarah Abdelsayed, MD, is an Assistant Professor and the Associate Program Director of the Addiction Medicine Fellowship in the Department of Family Medicine.

This funding will support an interdisciplinary social policy project focused on the following three areas: 1. public employee residency policies and relevant case law; 2. educator retention and attrition patterns in U.S. schools (pre- and post-Covid); and 3. factors contributing to staff and student overall health and well-being. Utilizing multiple qualitative methods, we will examine the history and contemporary existence of these policies and patterns, with specific attention paid to factors supporting and/or hindering educator and student social determinants of health. This research builds on previous critical, feminist, and critical race educational policy analyses by aiming to unpack hidden and visible power dynamics embodied within policy, discourse, and contextualized practice, which in turn shape the work experience of women educators and schooling experience of historically underserved and/or minoritized students.

Melinda Lemke (she/her/hers), PhD, is an Associate Professor of Educational Policy, Global Gender and Sexuality Studies Affiliated Faculty, and Honors College Faculty Fellow. Dr. Lemke is a former K-12 practitioner, qualitative methodologist, and her research areas include neoliberal educational reform, the politics of education, forced displacement, and how social policies and actors reinforce and/or ameliorate structural violence in the lives of young women and girls. Her work can be found in a range of practitioner, policy, and research outlets, including journals such as Children's Geographies, Gender and Education, and Journal of Education Policy. 

Over the last few decades, Caribbean studies has been instrumental in reconfiguring postcolonial studies by challenging the field’s focus on nationalist and identity-based rubrics. It has promoted a groundbreaking New World perspective called “creolization” that favors relationality and hybridity over the exclusionary logic of identity-based thought by highlighting the transcultural exchanges that occur both inside and across national, racial, linguistic, and class boundaries in a Creole society. Today, creolization’s cultural crossfertilization has been widely endorsed both as more reflective of our global and intersectional realities and as an emancipatory project. Indeed, its radical challenge to viewing racial, national, and cultural differences as discrete and categorical sites of alterity thwarts the process of establishing hierarchies based on such differences. Nevertheless, while postcolonial studies now almost uniformly embraces creolization’s coming together of cultures, languages, and races, the counterpart of cultural cross-fertilization in environmental studies is far from viewed as liberatory. When it is life forms rather than cultural forms that are at stake, the interaction between organisms from widely disparate places of origin often entails environmentally perverse rather than progressive effects that need to be managed. The enormous threat to Caribbean islands and their unique biodiversity from introduced invasive species is a case in point.

Creolized Ecologies examines the implications for Caribbean environmental and geographical realities of Caribbean literary representations of social, cultural, and national identities. In so doing, it brings into relief the incongruencies that often characterize depictions of environmental spaces in Caribbean fiction.

Carine M. Mardorossian, PhD, is a Professor of Global Gender Studies and English,  and Affiliated Faculty of Romance Languages and Literatures and Environmental and Sustainability Studies.

Art Work: Invisible Labour and the Legacy of Yugoslav Socialism (Praznik, 2021) argues that the invisibility of labor in the arts is gendered. But so is the labor movement. The current project is an extension of the book insofar as it seeks not just to expose the invisibility of art work as labor but to now work to render art visible as a form of labor: to this end, it is necessary to turn to labor organizing and unionization. With a group of majority women art workers in Ljubljana, we founded an art workers union. This new project will use this effort as a template to investigate whether the unionization of art workers could be replicated in the United States, and if not, why not?

Struggles against labor exploitation and fair payment in the arts have seen a new rise globally, especially in the wake of the pandemic. Women and labor struggles that concentrate women or feminized labor have been central to this resurgence, yet labor movements continue to be perceived as a masculine affair. This project will partially provide a redress to the lopsidedness of representations that fail to account for the presence and organizational skills of women in labor organizing.

Katja Praznik, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Arts Management Program and Department of Media Study.

This book is a medical humanities project exploring the mythological and ritual functions of scientific narratives of reproduction, gestation, and birth (embryologies) in Jewish ritual texts from late antiquity to the present. It is also a project in reparative reading, for while there is much talk of the Divine Feminine, there is little to ground that narrative in historical sources. To this end, the author will translate and analyze Hebrew texts that ritualize embryologies in instructions for prayers and incantations, performed by expectant fathers and pregnant mothers to request the safe delivery for mother and child, and by the whole community as petitions for rain. The texts date from late antiquity to modernity, with the earliest sources written exclusively by men, while some early modern and modern works are authored by women. Male-authored texts include Jewish legal texts (Talmud, 4th-6th C Persia), medical compendia (4th-6th C Persia), piyyutim or liturgical poetry (3rd-9th C Persia and Byzantium), and mystical (kabbalistic) texts (13th-16th C, Iberia and Palestine). In this way we see the relation between scientific narrative, religious myth, and ritual power, for as these embryological text develop myths focusing on divine maternity, they afford greater ritual power to the women who use them. 

Marla Segol, PhD, is an Associate Professor and the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Global Gender and Sexuality Studies.

This research seeks to accomplish three primary outcomes. First, it will provide a historical perspective on adoption, specifically within the Haudenosaunee Confederacy during the 20th century. Secondly, this research will result in the publication and sharing of the stories of Haudenosaunee women who were adopted as children into white families. In addition, this research seeks to advance our understanding of how Haudenosaunee women come to understand their cultural identity as adults and in relation to their adoption into white families. The women’s life stories will be aligned with HeavyRunner and Morris’s (1997) theory of cultural resiliency in order to provide insight as to the applicability of this theory to this group of women who were removed from their birth culture and forced to assimilate to the dominant white culture.

Kim VanDerLinden, PhD, is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Interdisciplinary Social Sciences program at the University at Buffalo and an Adjunct Professor at the College of William and Mary. Tricia Lyman, EdD, is a Clinical Assistant Professor Clinical Assistant Professor in the Social Sciences Interdisciplinary program at the University at Buffalo.

This study examines the less-known realm of vulnerable fatherhood in the practical and emotional realities of raising and educating children with disabilities in urban China. It is set in a particular type of institutions called special education schools where students with complex needs are accommodated in socially, spatially, and educationally segregated spaces. In China’s cultural and familial ideals, women bear disproportionate shame associated with birthing “less-than-perfect” offspring; as well, the “diminished” personhood of children with disabilities also renders fatherhood fragile and insecure. This study explores the embodied practices of “caring masculinities” performed by fathers, in the context of a special education school where disability profoundly destabilizes men’s self-understanding in relation to their children, partners, and educators. How do fathers navigate the fraught terrains of masculinity and (dis)ability and engage in the worlds of care? How do they mesh lingering patriarchal ideals with new embodiment, emotionality, and moral becoming in their everyday encounters in and out of the special education school? This study, part of a larger research on disability segregation in contemporary China, explores vulnerable fatherhood as a site of gender and disability intersection, and as the unintended consequence of a patriarchal structure that supposedly privileges men. 

Jinting Wu, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Educational Culture, Policy and Society in the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy.