My one contribution to the autopsies of the 2016 presidential election

A column in The Washington Post about the 2016 election and who is to blame for the outcome suggests that forecasting models had the race as pretty close to a toss-up, and cites a paper by James E. Campbell, UB Distinguished Professor of Political Science, published in the journal PS: Political Science & Politics. “So, how did these forecasts do? With a few exceptions, the accuracy of the presidential vote forecasts ranged from impressive to extraordinary,” he wrote.

Read more:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/05/02/my-one-contribution-to-the-autopsies-of-the-2016-presidential-election/?utm_term=.6e61602d84c3