Published August 6, 2015 This content is archived.
More than $100 million in federal funding was spent last year toward searching for a cure for Alzheimer’s disease. However, if given the choice, most people with dementia and those caring for them would like to see the money go elsewhere, according to a recent study led by UB researcher Davina Porock.
The study surveyed people with dementia and their care providers on how funding from the National Alzheimer’s Project Act (NAPA), a federal plan to overcome the disease, should be spent.
It revealed that the majority of respondents ranked caregiving support and resources for long-term care ahead of research for a cure.
The findings are in contrast to current NAPA spending to support those with Alzheimer’s disease, which dedicated only $10 million to care services and education, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.
With more than 5 million people in the U.S. living with dementia, each person receives less than $2 for care support, says Porock, a professor in the School of Nursing.
“Sure, most people in our surveys would love for there to be a cure, but in the meantime, they all have this disease and they need help,” she says. “We have 10 times more money going toward research instead of supporting the people who are living with dementia. Research is still high on the agenda, but they think that support is more important.”
The study, “National Priorities for Dementia Care: Perspectives of Persons Living with Dementia and their Care Partners,” was published in the Journal of Gerontological Nursing.
The nationwide survey recorded nearly 700 responses, drawing participants from more than 25 Alzheimer’s disease advocacy and patient-support groups. Participants were asked to rank funding priorities based on 11 themes that included care setting, quality of life, and advocacy and awareness.
Of the responses, the top five priorities were:
Respondents also preferred that not all research funding be allocated to finding a cure. Other areas of focus included workforce issues, education and training, impact on quality of life and the family, and alternative therapies and treatments.
Person-centered approaches to care were a clear theme in many of the responses. Most participants desired the person and family living with dementia — and not the disease — to be the center of care, policy and research.
Dementia is an irreversible condition that slowly impairs memory and cognitive skills, and eventually a person’s ability to carry out daily activities. People with dementia often need assistance eating, bathing and dressing, and sometimes have difficulties communicating.
Alzheimer’s disease makes up nearly half of all dementia cases; symptoms typically first appear after age 65.
“It’s a taxing job to take care of someone with dementia,” says Porock. “Families, as much as they love each other, can find these tasks physically and emotionally difficult to do. And when the caregiver is a spouse who is close in age, it’s not unheard of for them to die first.”
Another common issue involves caregivers putting their careers on hold to support an ailing family member and having difficulty returning to the workforce, Porock says.
Increased funding for families living with dementia could improve their ability to afford nursing support in their home or at an assisted living home.
“Dementia is a major, and increasing, issue in the world because we have more and more people living longer. And one of the consequences of us not dying from heart disease, cancer or other organ failures is that we live long enough for our brains to wear out,” she says.
Porock hopes the results lead policymakers and the NAPA advisory council to reconsider the priorities for funding to better address the needs of those living with dementia and those who care for them.
Additional researchers on the study include Louanne Bakk, assistant professor in the School of Social Work; Suzanne Sullivan, a doctoral candidate in the School of Nursing; Karen Love, founder of the Consumer Consortium on Assisted Living (CCAL); Jackie Pinkowitz, CCAL board chair; and Sonya Barsness of Sonya Barsness Consulting.
As the spouse of a professional man diagnosed at age 52 with early onset dementia, I wholeheartedly agree with the research findings.
It is hard for someone who hasn't been through it to imagine the exhaustion of dealing with a loved one who no longer functions, acts or responds to situations in keeping with their earlier personality. It is hard to imagine the weight of having a spouse, but not having any of the support, love and companionship that previously were available. This double burden -- caring for a loved one who doesn't act, think or behave like the loved one AND managing to do that without the love, support and companionship of said loved one -- is grueling.
As I once said to a friend of mine, "They don't write love songs about situations like ours." As caregivers, we move heaven and earth to take care of those we love and then, when the disease renders them violent, incapacitated or unable to do any self-care, we must get them admitted into a nursing home.
This has a whole new set of burdens, and while the daily care issue is resolved, none of the anxiety is. The financial burden, the application process, the Medicaid process when the money runs out -- these are very taxing on a family.
Thanks for doing this research. I hope it reaches a wider audience.
Susan Tannehill
Sorry, but I would much rather have a cure prior to my having any form of dementia.
I agree, financial assistance (since nursing homes charge almost double for dementia patients than other patients) would be great, but it would be better if none of us have to use it.
Betty Lock