Published July 30, 2019 This content is archived.
For decades, bacterial infections in people suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been treated primarily with traditional antibiotics. While such drugs can be effective in treating acute infections, they have had little clinical effect on the patient population as a whole: The disease remains the third most common cause of death in the U.S., and death rates have doubled since 1970.
Most commonly caused by smoking, COPD includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. It compromises the lungs’ innate defense against bacteria, allowing bacteria to persist and causing respiratory symptoms, coughing and sputum production. Current treatments include anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as frequent use of antibiotics.
Now, a UB team has received a five-year, $2.7 million National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant aimed at developing a much more precise method of treatment: the selective eradication of specific pathogens in the airways that affect quality of life and lead to the loss of lung function over time.
Highlights of the grant:
This is the 33rd year of continuous NIH funding for the researchers, who are among the world’s top scientists studying COPD. Timothy F. Murphy, SUNY Distinguished Professor and senior associate dean of clinical and translational research in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and Sanjay Sethi, professor; chief of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at the Jacobs School; division chief of UBMD Internal Medicine; and staff physician at the VA Western New York Healthcare System, have together conducted the longest prospective study of COPD in the world with monthly sampling. The research has broken new ground in understanding how bacterial infections affect patients, and therefore, how best to treat them.
The presence of bacterial pathogens in the lower airways, or bronchial passageways, reduces the quality of life for patients and accelerates the loss of lung function, Murphy explains.
“Long-term treatment with antibiotics is not a viable option,” he says. “Since they are not effective, they cause adverse effects and lead to resistance. By contrast, the selective eradication or ‘disarming’ of pathogens in the lower airways has great potential as an intervention.”
Both of the pathogens under study, NTHi and Mcat, have evolved mechanisms that allow them to proliferate in the human respiratory tract. “These are exclusively human pathogens,” Murphy says, “so inhibiting key molecules that cause them to persist will ‘tip the balance’ toward clearance.”
He explains that selectively targeting these pathogens has the advantage of leaving undisturbed the respiratory tract microbiome, the bacteria that are present normally and that protect the airways.
“Traditional antibiotics wipe out the normal microbiome, leaving the patient more susceptible to infection and causing unpleasant side effects,” he says. ”Selective eradication of pathogens is an entirely new approach to the problem.”
Murphy and Sethi work closely with Melinda Pettigrew of the Yale University School of Public Health, and Hervé Tettelin of the Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine.