News
Overconfidence can stunt reading skills
-
Print
-
Comments (4)
-
“Strong reading skills open doors to learning, whether through books, Web pages or other media.”
Too much confidence among teenage students can be harmful, UB researchers have found.
In a study that reinforces the danger of indiscriminately bolstering a child’s self-esteem—whether the child earns that distinction or not—the results show a clear connection between overconfident students and low reading comprehension, and suggest recommendations for parents and teachers.
“While some self-confidence is helpful, overconfident 15-year-olds are often below-average readers in all 34 countries we studied,” says Ming Ming Chiu, the lead author of the study and a professor in the Department of Learning and Instruction in the Graduate School of Education. “In contrast, underconfident 15-year-olds are more likely to be above-average readers in all 34 countries.”
The difference lies in a student’s ability to accurately assess and evaluate his or her own reading level, according to Chiu. Those who can accurately gauge their strengths and weaknesses are usually in a better position to identify realistic goals and achieve them.
“If an overconfident student chooses a book that is too hard—such as ‘The Lord of the Rings’ rather than ‘Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone’—he or she might stop reading after a few pages and let it sit on a bookshelf,” says Chiu. “In contrast, a more self-aware student is more likely to finish an easier book and continue reading more books.”
The research was the first large-scale international study of overconfidence and reading levels in almost 160,000 students—including nearly 4,000 U.S. students. It was co-written by Robert Klassen, associate professor in the University of Alberta’s Department of Educational Psychology, and published in the July edition of the professional educators’ journal Learning and Individual Differences. The educators used data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Program for International Student Assessment (PISA).
In their study, Chiu and Klassen also found interesting cultural differences relevant to student achievement: Countries that stressed individualism, such as the U.S. and Switzerland, tended to produce students whose overconfidence worked against their ability to assess their strengths and weaknesses accurately. In contrast, so-called collectivist countries that favored group interests, like South Korea and Japan, had greater reading comprehension.
“As students in more collectivistic countries were more aware of peers’ reading skills,” says Chiu, “they assessed their own reading ability more accurately and were less likely to be overconfident.”
Reading has long been considered essential to student learning. “Strong reading skills open doors to learning, whether through books, Web pages or other media,” says Chiu. The two researchers recommend parents and teachers help their children and students become suitably confident and strong readers by doing the following:
• Cultivate the idea of the self-test. Have students ask themselves, “How can I apply the ideas I’ve learned in today’s class to my daily life?” This self-test gives students feedback on how well they understand the ideas and thereby helps develop a suitable level of self-confidence.
• Review past performance. Reflecting on past performance on homework, tests and writing assignments anchors their confidence to a suitable level and prevents overconfidence.
• Peer evaluation. Using classmates as a ruler to evaluate one’s own strengths and weaknesses can reduce overconfidence—for example, by asking, “Do I understand the books as well as my classmates?”
• Identify achievable goals. Encourage children to choose goals they can successfully accomplish. Healthy confidence and self-assessment can help children set more realistic and achievable goals to ignite a virtuous cycle of high motivation and high achievement.
Reader Comments
Robert Sparks says:
I found this similar to another experiment that I read about in a book discussing the latest neuroscience and it's insights into the way we make decisions. The book is called How We Decide by Jonah Lehrer, and he discusses a study performed by Carol Dweck, a psychologist at Stanford that demonstrates the differences between students who are praised for innate intelligence and those who are praised for trying hard. The study revealed that students who are praised for intelligence almost always choose to bolster their self-esteem by comparing themselves with students who performed worse on the test, whereas, students praised for their hard work wanted to understand their mistakes, learn from their errors, and attempt to figure out how to do better. Praising kids for their intelligence (potentially breeding overconfidence) actually encourages kids to avoid something I have not managed to avoid, which is learning from mistakes.
Posted by Robert Sparks, Law student, 08/17/09
Francisca Nwoke says:
I disagree, whether we like it or not students do already compare themselves to each other in other areas, athletics, body perception and abilities are often weighed against what others can do. It's seems telling that the one area a lot of students seem to be willing to allow their parents and society to convince them to view performance individually is in academics, something often seen as tedious and time consuming. I find it funny when students attain B's and C's in a subject and rationalize that their talents lay elsewhere, when in fact while genius may not always be attained, grasping basic concepts starts with a willingness to explore when young.
Posted by Francisca Nwoke, Grad Student, 08/16/09
Oluwafemi s.Balogun says:
I agree with melissa, in that,we're unique being, in different ways,so it is only fair to say, each and every student should be given their own space to explore on what ways is best suitable for them to learn.just for instance, I learn better in group discussion,and i know someone that will only grasp any reading material by reading on his own over and over untill he gets it. However, like melissa said group discussion is relevant, since at the end of the day it all boil down to teamwork and diverse perpectives makes the world to be fine.
Posted by Oluwafemi s.Balogun, undergraduate student, 08/14/09
Melissa A. Swiatek-Odien says:
I think it is wrong to ask students to compare themselves with others. I think encouraging this pattern of thinking is dangerous and can lead to under-confidence in other areas of life such as body image or areas of individual talent (i.e. music, athletics). I think it would be a better suggestion to tell students to listen to their classmates and to pay attention to their different interpretations of the book and learn from them.
Posted by Melissa A. Swiatek-Odien, Grad Student, 08/14/09