This article is from the archives of the UB Reporter.
News

Simpson vows to continue pursuit of reforms, following Albany setback

By Arthur Page
Published: August 4, 2010

In the wake of the state Legislature’s failure to approve reforms empowering UB and SUNY, President John B. Simpson said that he will “continue to do all within my power to further our vision of empowering UB to achieve its full potential as a great university.”

“I remain convinced that UB 2020 is the right plan for UB, and the right plan for the region,” Simpson said in an e-mail message sent to university employees on Aug. 4.

“Our fight is not over,” he vowed. “I am calling on all UB supporters to urge Albany’s leaders to continue their talks and find a way to enact the reforms we need in order to create a better future for Western New York.”

The president said he is “deeply disappointed that Albany has failed once again to give UB the policy tools we need to gain new operating resources, and use those resources more effectively.

“This failure is bad for students, bad for the university and bad for the Western New York community,” he added.

Not only does the belated state budget passed Aug. 3 by the Legislature not include any of the reforms to empower SUNY and UB that were part of the Public Higher Education Empowerment and Innovation Act, it also includes an additional $210 million in cuts to SUNY, bringing to 30 percent the total reduction in state support over the past three years.

“On top of these very significant cuts, students have watched their tuition increase by large amounts, virtually all of which has gone as a tax to the state, while the university has been able to provide less and less,” Simpson noted. “And we have been forced to continue to operate in a highly regulated environment, more befitting a state agency than a research university. Simply put, the regulatory status quo, which we are now left with, will not allow this university to thrive.”

By failing to approve the reforms, Simpson said, “Albany declined to put UB on a level playing field with our national peers and declined to give our university the ability to contribute optimally to the greater social and economic good of our region and our state.”

He noted that UB’s peer research universities across the country “have the ability to define their own course and control their own destiny. They can do so because their states have enlightened leadership that recognizes and supports the educational and research value that public research universities offer their students and their communities.”

Addressing the UB 2020 vision of empowering UB to achieve its full potential as a great university, Simpson added: “I have no doubts, even today, that we are capable of achieving this if we are given the tools we need. Now, without the empowerment legislation, the road ahead to that aspiration is far more difficult, and far longer. Yet I believe that we must not let it deter us from achieving our goals.

“Despite the disappointing outcome, we continue to draw strength and inspiration from the united support of the entire Western New York community, which has stood together to support UB and SUNY from the beginning of this long journey,” Simpson said. “Our efforts continue to be supported by business, labor, civic organizations, the Western New York delegation, our faculty, staff and students, and the majority of New Yorkers.”

He added: “Together, we must continue to challenge the status quo, to be resolved in our commitment for the future, and remain true to our values, mission and vision.”

Reader Comments

David Hadbawnik says:

Hopefully this will convince Simpson that it's time to move on. He clearly has no interest in being the president of a public university. I agree that it's alarming that Albany seems to have punted on this issue, rather than deciding on some sort of proactive measure to deal with problems in SUNY ... but I'm very relieved that Simpson's privatization plan did not go through.

Shame on the Reporter for once again failing to mention ANY criticism of the PHIEEA scheme. At least in the Buffalo News there was this:

"Critics, who included Democratic leaders in the Assembly and a number of Senate Democrats, contend the plan would raise tuition too high and restrict access to the system for low-income students."

Posted by David Hadbawnik, phd student, 08/05/10