News
‘Fracking’ releases uranium in shale
UB geologist Tracy Bank and colleagues scanned samples of Marcellus shale to determine if hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” led to the release of uranium, as well as natural gas. Photo: DOUGLAS LEVERE
-
Print -
Comments
-
“Even though at these levels uranium is not a radioactive risk, it is still a toxic, deadly metal.”
Scientific and political disputes over drilling Marcellus shale for natural gas have focused primarily on the environmental effects of pumping millions of gallons of water and chemicals deep underground to blast through rocks to release the natural gas.
But UB researchers now have found that that process—called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking”—also causes uranium that is naturally trapped inside Marcellus shale to be released, raising additional environmental concerns.
The research was presented earlier this week at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America.
Marcellus shale, a massive rock formation that stretches from New York through Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia, often is described as the nation’s largest source of natural gas.
“Marcellus shale naturally traps metals, such as uranium, and at levels higher than usually found naturally, but lower than manmade contamination levels,” says Tracy Bank, assistant professor of geology in the College of Arts and Sciences and lead researcher. “My question was, if they start drilling and pumping millions of gallons of water into these underground rocks, will that force the uranium into the soluble phase and mobilize it? Will uranium then show up in groundwater?”
To find out, Bank and her UB colleagues scanned the surfaces of Marcellus shale samples from Western New York and Pennsylvania. Using sensitive chemical instruments, they created a chemical map of the surfaces to determine the precise location in the shale of the hydrocarbons, the organic compounds containing natural gas.
“We found that the uranium and the hydrocarbons are in the same physical space,” says Bank. “We found that they are not just physically—but also chemically—bound.
“That led me to believe that uranium in solution could be more of an issue because the process of drilling to extract the hydrocarbons could start mobilizing the metals as well, forcing them into the soluble phase and causing them to move around.”
When Bank and her colleagues reacted samples in the lab with surrogate drilling fluids, they found that the uranium was indeed being solubilized.
In addition, she says, when the millions of gallons of water used in hydraulic fracturing come back to the surface, it could contain uranium contaminants, potentially polluting streams and other ecosystems, and generating hazardous waste.
The research required the use of very sophisticated methods of analysis, including one called Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry, or ToF-SIMS, in the laboratory of Joseph A. Gardella Jr., Larkin Professor of Chemistry at UB.
The UB research is the first to map samples using this technique, which identified the precise location of the uranium.
“Even though at these levels uranium is not a radioactive risk, it is still a toxic, deadly metal,” Bank concludes. “We need a fundamental understanding of how uranium exists in shale. The more we understand about how it exists, the more we can better predict how it will react to fracking.”
Bank conducted the experiments with geology graduate students Thomas Malizia and Lauren Fortson, and Lisa Andresky, an undergraduate student from Slippery Rock University in Pennsylvania. Andresky worked in Bank’s lab during the summer while on a National Science Foundation-funded Research Experience for Undergraduates in UB’s Ecosystem Restoration through Interdisciplinary Exchange (ERIE) program.
Reader Comments